Earn attention that converts
PR, influencers and launch strategy for crypto teams

About TokenPR

TokenPR is a crypto public relations and marketing agency that also runs a newsroom. Those are two different businesses with two different incentives, and most companies in this position prefer not to draw attention to the fact. We take the opposite view: the arrangement is defensible only if we describe it accurately and constrain it with rules a reader can check.

The agency side works with blockchain teams on press strategy, media relations, influencer programmes, token launch go-to-market, and content and SEO. The editorial side publishes reporting on blockchain technology, crypto markets and decentralised finance, alongside practitioner-written playbooks on marketing and PR. The publication is not a lead magnet with a masthead attached. It has its own staff, its own sourcing standards, and a documented separation from the commercial team that is set out in full in our editorial policy.

The reason both exist under one roof is that each is genuinely better for the other. Running campaigns teaches you things about how coverage actually happens that no amount of commentary from the sidelines will. Running a newsroom teaches you what reporters actually respond to, which is rarely what agencies assume. Our marketing playbooks are written by people who run the campaigns; our reporting is done by people who are not selling anything to the companies they cover.

The risk in that structure is obvious, so we will name it. An agency-owned publication can quietly degrade into an advertorial machine where the line between coverage and client service disappears. Our answer is structural rather than reassuring. Paid placement is labelled at the top of the page before you read a sentence of it, carries no staff byline, is excluded from our news feed and our Google News sitemap, and is never marked up as news for search engines. The newsroom does not take briefs from the commercial team and does not see the client list before filing. If a client does something newsworthy and unflattering, we report it and we disclose the relationship inside the article.

Who this site is for

Four groups, and the site is deliberately organised around them. Founders and project leads who need to be taken seriously by people who have seen a great many crypto announcements. Marketers and growth leads who want tactics with measurement attached rather than another listicle. Builders and developers who want infrastructure coverage written by someone who read the specification. And people following the market who want reporting that is not trying to sell them anything.

What we do

Four services. Each has its own page with the full deliverable list, the process, the pricing conversation and — the part most agency sites omit — an explicit list of what we will not do.

Crypto PR and media placement

Press strategy, media relations, announcement campaigns and crisis communications. The working premise is that a reporter will check everything you say, so the work happens upstream of the pitch: establishing what is genuinely new, who is credible to say it, what evidence supports it, and when it should land.

Most crypto announcements are ignored, and the team is rarely told why. The reasons are usually mundane. The news is not new. The person quoted is not credible on the subject. The claim cannot be verified without taking the team’s word for it. The release landed the same morning as something bigger. The standard response is to buy placements, which produces a wall of paid articles nobody reads and a media presence that collapses the moment anyone looks closely.

We do not guarantee coverage, because nobody honestly can. A publication that lets an agency guarantee placement is selling advertising and calling it something else. What we commit to is the work that makes coverage likely, and to telling you when the story is not there yet — which is a service, not a failure. An agency that pitches everything burns your name with the twenty journalists who actually matter in your category.

Influencer marketing

Vetted creator outreach, disclosure-compliant sponsorships and measurement that can distinguish a campaign that worked from one that merely happened.

Crypto influencer marketing has two structural problems. A large share of reachable audience is not real, which makes follower count close to useless as a buying signal. And most campaigns are measured by screenshotting view counts, which cannot tell you whether anything changed. Sitting on top of both is a compliance problem: undisclosed paid promotion breaches the rules in most of the markets you care about, and enforcement is going one direction.

We treat this like media buying, because that is what it is. Creators are screened on engagement quality, audience overlap with the rest of your roster, and disclosure history — including whether they have previously promoted something that collapsed. Every placement is disclosed. Every campaign has an objective agreed before launch and a post-mortem allowed to conclude it failed.

Token launch and go-to-market

Positioning, narrative, sequencing and the twelve weeks of work that decide whether launch day is an event or an anticlimax.

Most launches are lost long before the date, in positioning work nobody wanted to do three months earlier. The team arrives with a product, a Discord and no answer to the only question that matters: why should anyone not already following you care? The second failure is sequencing — community, exchange conversations, press and creator activity have different lead times, and running them in the wrong order wastes most of the effort.

We are compliance-aware throughout, which in practice means we will not build a campaign around price, returns or a presale, and we will tell you when something you want to say creates a problem in a market you operate in.

Content and SEO

Thought leadership, documentation-grade explainers, technical SEO and distribution.

Crypto content marketing has converged on one format: the thin explainer, produced at volume, indistinguishable from every other thin explainer and increasingly generated rather than written. It ranked for a while. It ranks considerably less well now, and it does nothing for a reader deciding whether to trust you. Meanwhile the content that would actually differentiate a technical team — the honest post-mortem, the architecture decision record, the benchmark with its methodology published — goes unwritten because it is harder.

We write the harder thing, and we do the unglamorous technical work properly: information architecture, internal linking, schema, Core Web Vitals, and the crawl and indexation problems that quietly cap everything else. We would rather fix why your existing content is not ranking than sell you thirty more pieces stacked on top of it.

How to choose a crypto PR agency

We are obviously not a neutral party here, so treat this as a description of the questions we would want asked of us. If an agency cannot answer these comfortably, that tells you something regardless of who they are.

Ask what they will not do. An agency with no refusals has no standards, and an agency with no standards will eventually attach your name to something you would not have chosen. Ours are listed on every service page. If the answer is a vague “we only work with quality projects”, press for specifics.

Ask them to distinguish earned coverage from paid placement in their case studies. A great many crypto agency portfolios are lists of paid articles presented as press hits. The two look identical in a screenshot and are worth wildly different amounts. If a report does not separate them, assume the ratio is unfavourable.

Ask who actually does the work. A common pattern is a senior pitch followed by delivery from a junior team you never met, with an account manager between you and anyone who understands your product. Ask for the name of the person who will write your messaging.

Ask what happens when the news is bad. Crisis capability is not something you can procure in the week you need it. If the answer is a blank look, you have a fair-weather supplier.

Ask how they will measure it. If the answer involves impressions, reach or “media value”, ask what business outcome those numbers correspond to. Frequently the honest answer is none. A good agency will agree an objective with you before the work starts and report against that objective even when the result is poor.

Be suspicious of anyone who promises coverage, a listing, or anything to do with price. The first is a placement being bought and misdescribed. The second is generally outside any agency’s control. The third is either a fantasy or a description of market manipulation, and neither is something you want in writing.

Crypto marketing intelligence

The Crypto Marketing section is the part of this site we care most about, because it is where we demonstrate the craft rather than describe it. Our practitioners write up their own discipline in enough detail that you could run the play yourself. Some readers will, and that is the intended outcome — a founder who reads a playbook and executes it is a better prospect later than one who was sold a retainer they did not understand.

The section covers three areas.

PR tips covers the mechanics most founders are never taught: how an embargo actually works, why “exclusive” means something specific, what makes a spokesperson quotable, how to structure an announcement so a journalist can verify it quickly, and how to handle the first hostile question in a way that does not generate a second story.

Influencer strategy covers vetting, deal structure, disclosure compliance and measurement — including the vetting framework we use before any creator is put in front of a client, and the specific signals that indicate an audience is not what the follower count suggests.

Token launches covers go-to-market: positioning, narrative, the twelve-week sequenced calendar, community and PR ordering, and contingency planning for the things that reliably go wrong on the day.

Downloadable templates and checklists live in the resources library — press release structures, launch checklists, media-map templates and briefing documents you can use directly.

Why most crypto pitches fail

Because we run both sides of this, we see the same pitch from the agency desk and from the reporter’s inbox, and the failure modes are strikingly consistent.

It is not new. A partnership that is a letter of intent, a licence that is an application, a launch date that has moved twice, a “first ever” that is the fourth. Reporters check, and the check takes ninety seconds. The moment one claim fails, nothing else in the email is read.

There is no verifiable evidence. A claim a journalist cannot substantiate without your say-so is not a story, it is a request to be trusted. Numbers with a stated methodology, documents, on-chain data, named customers willing to speak — these convert. Adjectives do not.

The spokesperson is wrong. Founders are not automatically the right voice. The person who can explain the specific thing being announced, in plain language, without reciting the deck, is the right voice — and they are often the engineer.

It went to everyone. A blast to two hundred addresses is visible as a blast, and it prices your news at zero. Ten well-chosen reporters who cover exactly your category, with a reason each should care, beats it every time.

The timing was unforced. Announcing into a larger story in your own sector is a self-inflicted wound. So is Friday afternoon, and so is the week of a major industry conference unless you are at it.

There is no second sentence. If a reader cannot repeat what you do to a colleague after one line, the piece will not be written and would not be read if it were.

How we measure marketing that resists measurement

Crypto marketing has an attribution problem, and most of the industry has responded by measuring things that are easy rather than things that matter. We would rather admit the limits and measure honestly inside them.

Impressions, reach and “advertising value equivalent” are not outcomes. They are inputs at best and theatre at worst. We report them where a client wants them, clearly marked as activity rather than result.

What we actually track: share of voice against a named competitor set in publications that matter to your buyers; message pull-through, meaning whether the coverage says what you needed it to say rather than merely mentioning you; inbound quality, meaning whether the conversations you are now having are with better counterparties; and branded search volume, which is the closest reliable proxy for whether more of the right people know you exist.

For influencer work we insist on a measurement plan agreed before launch, a holdout where the campaign structure permits one, and a post-mortem allowed to conclude the campaign did not work. That last condition is the one most agencies quietly omit, and it is the only thing that makes the previous two worth doing.

One thing you will not find in this section: advice premised on moving a price. It is not a service we offer, it is not achievable by marketing, and presented as a promise it describes market manipulation.

Mistakes we see most often

Launching before positioning. The single most expensive error, and the least visible while it is happening. Teams spend twelve weeks on campaign mechanics and no time at all on why anyone should care, then conclude that PR does not work.

Treating the community as a channel. A Discord is not a distribution list. Communities that are only ever broadcast to stop reading, and the metric that reveals it — active participants rather than member count — is the one nobody reports.

Buying reach instead of relevance. A million impressions from an audience that will never use your product is worth less than two thousand from people who will. Crypto pricing does not reflect this, which is exactly why vetting pays.

Publishing volume to chase rankings. Thirty thin explainers is a liability, not an asset, and increasingly a ranking problem rather than a ranking strategy.

Going quiet between announcements. Reporters build relationships with sources who are useful when they are not selling something. Teams that appear only when they need coverage are read as what they are.

Confusing disclosure with weakness. Labelled promotion outperforms undisclosed promotion over any horizon longer than a quarter, and it does not detonate later.

Blockchain tech

Blockchain Tech covers infrastructure: how it works, what changed, and who needs to act on it. The coverage is written from a build perspective rather than a finance one, which means reading the specification, the client release notes and, where it matters, the diff.

The recurring theme is that most of the interesting risk in this industry is operational rather than cryptographic. Bridges rarely fail because the mathematics was wrong; they fail because a multisig had five signers and two shared a laptop. Upgradeable contracts do not fail because upgradeability is inherently bad; they fail because nobody documented who holds the admin key. We cover those seams, and we take post-mortems seriously — including the ones teams would rather quietly delete.

We are careful with the word “decentralised”. A network with ten thousand nodes and three entities producing every block is a specific arrangement with specific failure modes, and we would rather describe the arrangement than argue about the label. Readers occasionally find this pedantic; teams whose sequencer went down for six hours generally do not.

We also do not write about a protocol purely on the basis of its own documentation. Where a claim can be checked against on-chain data, a client release or a published audit, we check it, and we say in the article what we were able to verify and what we were not.

Sub-sections: Layer 1 & 2 for base-layer and scaling architecture, throughput, finality, data availability, rollups and bridges; Smart Contracts for contract design, audits, upgradeability and recurring failure modes; and Tech Updates for releases, forks, client upgrades and standards work.

Crypto news

Crypto News is independent reporting on the market and the companies in it. Straight, sourced, and free of the two things that dominate crypto media: price speculation and undisclosed promotion.

Our reporting focuses on market structure rather than price action. Where an asset trades on a given morning is close to the least informative thing about it. Who is allowed to trade it, under whose licence, with whose custody arrangements, and what happens when a counterparty fails — those determine whether a market survives its next bad quarter.

We also apply a simple test that removes a surprising share of crypto news: has the thing actually happened? A great deal of coverage in this sector consists of repeating an announcement about the future — a partnership with no contract, a licence that is an application, a product with a date attached. Where we report on something not yet done, we say so in those words rather than borrowing the certainty of the press release.

Because TokenPR is owned by an agency, the newsroom operates under an explicit constraint that is worth restating here: the desk does not take briefs from the commercial side, does not see the client roster before publication, and covers clients on the same terms as anyone else with the relationship disclosed in the piece.

Sub-sections: Altcoins, Bitcoin & Ethereum and Market Trends, the last of which is structural analysis — liquidity, regulation, institutional participation, infrastructure — and never price prediction.

The newsroom works to a documented sourcing standard: at least three independent sources for contested claims, a named source or documentation we have seen for any allegation of wrongdoing, a description of the documents where a story rests on them, and an explicit statement in the article where we could not verify something. Subjects of critical coverage are offered a right of reply before publication.

Web3 & DeFi

Web3 & DeFi covers decentralised applications and the organisations running them, with a bias towards the distance between how a system is described and how it behaves under stress.

A lending market is not defined by its yields in a calm month but by its liquidation mechanics on the worst day of the year. A stablecoin is not defined by its peg but by the redemption path when everyone wants out simultaneously. We write about those mechanics in enough detail that you can form your own view, and stop well short of telling you what to do with your money.

On governance we are persistent sceptics of headline participation figures, and track what we call the governance gap: the difference between a DAO’s stated decision process and the handful of addresses that decide outcomes in practice. Turnout, delegate concentration, quorum thresholds that have never been tested, and treasuries denominated almost entirely in the protocol’s own token are recurring subjects.

The through-line across all of it is that composability moves risk around rather than removing it. A protocol can be individually sound and still be one oracle, one bridge or one concentrated depositor away from a bad week, and those dependencies are rarely on the landing page. We try to draw the dependency graph rather than review the marketing.

Sub-sections: DAOs, DeFi Projects and NFTs — the last covering the cases where tokenised ownership solves a real coordination problem, and being candid about where it is still theatre.

How we protect editorial independence

This is the section that matters most, because it is the one you have least reason to take on trust.

The three kinds of content here

Every article on this site is exactly one of the following, and you can always tell which before you start reading.

Newsroom reporting and analysis. Written by our editorial staff. Nobody paid for it. Carries a named byline linking to a profile, a publication date, and a sources list where relevant. Marked up as NewsArticle for search engines. Included in our news feed and Google News sitemap.

Marketing playbooks and resources. Written by our practitioners about their own discipline. Self-interested in the ordinary sense — we would like you to hire us — but the advice is not for sale and no third party paid for its content. Carries a named byline.

Sponsored content and press releases. Paid for by a third party. Carries a visible Sponsored or Press Release label at the top of the page and a disclosure banner above the text. Carries no staff byline, because attributing paid placement to a named editor is exactly the conflation we are trying to avoid. Excluded from the news feed and the Google News sitemap. Never marked up as NewsArticle. Outbound links carry rel="sponsored", applied automatically and not removable by advertiser request. All of it is collected at /press-releases/.

The separation, concretely

• The commercial team does not assign, approve, review or veto newsroom articles, and does not see them before publication.
• Reporters are not told who the clients are before they file. Where a reporter discovers a subject is a client, that is disclosed inside the article.
• No client has been promised coverage as part of a services agreement. We do not sell coverage, and the commercial team could not deliver it if it tried.
• Client status neither earns coverage nor prevents it.

What we refuse, at any price

• Presale and token-sale promotion.
• Price predictions, price targets and return forecasts — in any content type, including paid.
• Undisclosed influencer promotion.
• Guaranteed-coverage offers.
• Requests to remove or soften a disclosure label.
• Claims about partnerships, licences, audits or listings that have not happened.
• Gambling and casino affiliate placement.
• AI-generated body prose published as reporting or thought leadership.

We decline work on these grounds regularly. That is the only reason the label means anything. Full detail is on the sponsored disclosure and editorial policy pages; if you want to advertise within those constraints, see advertise with TokenPR.

Why we publish the constraints instead of just claiming independence

Every publication says it is independent. The claim is free, which is precisely why it carries no information. What carries information is a constraint that costs something: a list of work we turn down, a labelling rule that cannot be waived for a large advertiser, a technical exclusion from the news sitemap that we cannot quietly reverse for one client without reversing it for everyone.

Those are the things on this page, and they are checkable. You can look at any commercial article on this site and confirm it carries no staff byline. You can read our news sitemap and confirm sponsored items are absent. You can inspect the markup on a press release and confirm it is not declared as news. If any of that stops being true, we have broken a promise you can demonstrate rather than merely suspect — and we would rather be held to that standard than to a paragraph of reassurance.

Corrections

We correct errors of fact promptly and visibly. Corrected articles carry a note stating what changed and when. We do not silently edit a published claim out of existence. To request a correction, email corrections@tokenpr.net with the URL and the specific claim in dispute.

Meet the team

Every article on TokenPR carries a byline, and every byline links to a profile with a beat, a background and a standard. Our practitioners write the marketing and PR material; our reporters cover the news. The full list is on the team page.

A note on how we handle bylines, because it bears directly on the trust argument above. TokenPR publishes under consistent named editorial personas rather than under the private identities of individual staff. Each persona owns a beat and a standard and corresponds to real work by real people here. They are not biographies of specific named private individuals, and the avatars are illustrative marks rather than photographs. We state this plainly because implying otherwise — inventing a verifiable career history for a person who does not exist — would be precisely the kind of fabricated credential the rest of this page argues against. If you need to reach the person behind a byline for a correction or a right of reply, editorial@tokenpr.net reaches them.

Work with us

If you are launching something, announcing something, or simply trying to be taken seriously by an audience that has seen a lot of crypto announcements, tell us what you are building. We answer every enquiry, usually within one working day, including the ones where the honest answer is that you do not need an agency yet.

Get a quote See case studies Read the playbooks